THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJAYBHAI URFE LANGADI AMRUTBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - N R GUJARIYA — 438/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN030005902025
Filing Number
438/2025
Filing Date
17-Nov-2025
Registration No
438/2025
Registration Date
17-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203039250291
Police Station
MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJAYBHAI URFE LANGADI AMRUTBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - N R GUJARIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary of Case CC-438-2025 The State of Gujarat filed a petition against Ajaybhai Urfe Langadi Amrutbhai Chauhan before the Nyayik Mejistret (Magistrate Court) in Mehsana. The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 271(1) for obstruction of justice and sentenced him to imprisonment and fine. The judgment upheld the conviction based on evidence establishing the accused's intentional interference with legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 438/2025
Summary of Case CC-438-2025 The State of Gujarat filed a petition against Ajaybhai Urfe Langadi Amrutbhai Chauhan before the Nyayik Mejistret (Magistrate Court) in Mehsana. The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 271(1) for obstruction of justice and sentenced him to imprisonment and fine. The judgment upheld the conviction based on evidence establishing the accused's intentional interference with legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts