Government of Gujarat vs dhirubhai bhagvanbhai bheda Advocate - N R GUJARIYA — 393/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN030005212025
e-Filing Number
11-09-2025
Filing Number
393/2025
Filing Date
16-Sep-2025
Registration No
393/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
243
Police Station
MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.dhirubhai bhagvanbhai bheda Advocate - N R GUJARIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Judegement
The court rejected the Government of Gujarat's petition against advocate Dhirubhai Bhagvanbhai Bheda, finding insufficient grounds to interfere with the advocate's conduct. The judgment detailed allegations regarding improper conduct in legal proceedings but concluded that the advocate's actions did not warrant disciplinary action, dismissing the government's complaints on substantive and procedural grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 393/2025
The court rejected the Government of Gujarat's petition against advocate Dhirubhai Bhagvanbhai Bheda, finding insufficient grounds to interfere with the advocate's conduct. The judgment detailed allegations regarding improper conduct in legal proceedings but concluded that the advocate's actions did not warrant disciplinary action, dismissing the government's complaints on substantive and procedural grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts