THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MINABEN W.O BHANUBHAI CHUDASAMA Advocate - N R GUJARIYA — 289/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 03rd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN030003872025

Case disposed

Filing Number

289/2025

Filing Date

16-07-2025

Registration No

289/2025

Registration Date

16-07-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203039250114

Police Station

MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

MINABEN W.O BHANUBHAI CHUDASAMA Advocate - N R GUJARIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

03-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

06-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

02-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

02-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

03-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CC-289/2025 Court Decision: The Metropolitan Magistrate Court in Mehsana dismissed the criminal case against Minaben W.O. Bhanubhai Chudasama (respondent). The court found insufficient credible evidence to establish the allegations and determined that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court acquitted the respondent of all charges under the relevant Indian Penal Code sections, including forgery and related offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC-289/2025 Court Decision: The Metropolitan Magistrate Court in Mehsana dismissed the criminal case against Minaben W.O. Bhanubhai Chudasama (respondent). The court found insufficient credible evidence to establish the allegations and determined that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court acquitted the respondent of all charges under the relevant Indian Penal Code sections, including forgery and related offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case