PANERA SHAILESHKUMAR SAMATBHAI vs HATHLIYA MASARIBHAI BHIKHABHAI Advocate - R M BALOLIYA — 167/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN030002292025
Filing Number
167/2025
Filing Date
22-05-2025
Registration No
167/2025
Registration Date
22-05-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PANERA SHAILESHKUMAR SAMATBHAI
Adv. M J ZALA
Respondent(s)
HATHLIYA MASARIBHAI BHIKHABHAI Advocate - R M BALOLIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER
PLEA
WARRANT OF ARREST
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 27-02-2026 | PLEA |
| 23-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petition filed by Panera Shaileshkumar Samatbhai against respondent Hathliya Masaribhai Bhikhabhai. The judgment, issued on 18/03/2025 by the Mendarda Court (First Class), found the petition to lack merit and upheld the lower court's decision, ordering the petitioner to bear the costs of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petition filed by Panera Shaileshkumar Samatbhai against respondent Hathliya Masaribhai Bhikhabhai. The judgment, issued on 18/03/2025 by the Mendarda Court (First Class), found the petition to lack merit and upheld the lower court's decision, ordering the petitioner to bear the costs of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts