PARASHBHAI GORDHANBHAI KANABAR vs ROHITBHAI RAMESHBHAI BAKHALKIYA Advocate - S B PARMAR — 154/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN030002212024
Filing Number
154/2024
Filing Date
25-04-2024
Registration No
154/2024
Registration Date
25-04-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARASHBHAI GORDHANBHAI KANABAR
Adv. R M BALOLIYA
Respondent(s)
ROHITBHAI RAMESHBHAI BAKHALKIYA Advocate - S B PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 10-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 23-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court (Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mehsana) dismissed the case filed under Order-31 as the petitioner failed to establish grounds for the case and could not prove the required conditions. The judgment, dated 18/03/2025, determined that the petitioner's claims lacked sufficient evidence and legal merit for proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court (Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mehsana) dismissed the case filed under Order-31 as the petitioner failed to establish grounds for the case and could not prove the required conditions. The judgment, dated 18/03/2025, determined that the petitioner's claims lacked sufficient evidence and legal merit for proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts