PARASHBHAI GORDHANBHAI KANABAR vs ROHITBHAI RAMESHBHAI BAKHALKIYA Advocate - S B PARMAR — 154/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN030002212024

Filing Number

154/2024

Filing Date

25-Apr-2024

Registration No

154/2024

Registration Date

25-Apr-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARASHBHAI GORDHANBHAI KANABAR

    Adv. R M BALOLIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROHITBHAI RAMESHBHAI BAKHALKIYA Advocate - S B PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court (Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mehsana) dismissed the case filed under Order-31 as the petitioner failed to establish grounds for the case and could not prove the required conditions. The judgment, dated 18/03/2025, determined that the petitioner's claims lacked sufficient evidence and legal merit for proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 29-Dec-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 02-Dec-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 03-Nov-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 29-Sep-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 19-May-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 27-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 17-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 26-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 28-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 31-May-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 17-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 25-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 25-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 154/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court (Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mehsana) dismissed the case filed under Order-31 as the petitioner failed to establish grounds for the case and could not prove the required conditions. The judgment, dated 18/03/2025, determined that the petitioner's claims lacked sufficient evidence and legal merit for proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case