BHOLENATH FINANCE THOURGH HITESHBHAI GHUSABHAI NAGESHREE vs HANIFBHAI AJITBHAI LULANIYA Advocate - H S DESAI — 141/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN030001812025
Filing Number
141/2025
Filing Date
08-04-2025
Registration No
141/2025
Registration Date
08-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHOLENATH FINANCE THOURGH HITESHBHAI GHUSABHAI NAGESHREE
Adv. J P JOSHI
Respondent(s)
HANIFBHAI AJITBHAI LULANIYA Advocate - H S DESAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-02-2026 | PLEA |
| 07-01-2026 | PLEA |
| 16-12-2025 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the petition filed under Order-10 (likely a procedural order) as the petitioner failed to establish grounds for relief. The judgment indicates that since the petitioner could not adequately substantiate their claims and the respondent's contentions were found valid, the petition lacks merit and is accordingly rejected with directions for proper legal remedies as prescribed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the petition filed under Order-10 (likely a procedural order) as the petitioner failed to establish grounds for relief. The judgment indicates that since the petitioner could not adequately substantiate their claims and the respondent's contentions were found valid, the petition lacks merit and is accordingly rejected with directions for proper legal remedies as prescribed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts