THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MAMADBHAI BABUBHAI MORI — 49/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN030001142026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

49/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

49/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

43

Police Station

MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAMADBHAI BABUBHAI MORI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Mamadbhai Babubhai Mori (49/2026) The court convicted Mamadbhai Babubhai Mori under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for his first offense, sentencing him to six months rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹200 (or three days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid). The court considered the voluntary confession, first-time offender status, and poor financial circumstances as mitigating factors while imposing the minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 49/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Mamadbhai Babubhai Mori (49/2026) The court convicted Mamadbhai Babubhai Mori under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for his first offense, sentencing him to six months rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹200 (or three days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid). The court considered the voluntary confession, first-time offender status, and poor financial circumstances as mitigating factors while imposing the minimum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case