THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HARESHBHAI VIRAJIBHAI RAKHASIYA — 45/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN030001102026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

45/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARESHBHAI VIRAJIBHAI RAKHASIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Hareshbhai Virajibhai Rakhasiya under IPC sections 185 and 65(1)(b), imposing a fine of Rs. 1,000 with one-month imprisonment in default, and Rs. 10,000 with two-month imprisonment in default under prohibition statute section 61(1)(b). The court found the accused guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol and violating prohibition laws based on medical examination and evidence establishing intoxication and unlawful possession of liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Hareshbhai Virajibhai Rakhasiya under IPC sections 185 and 65(1)(b), imposing a fine of Rs. 1,000 with one-month imprisonment in default, and Rs. 10,000 with two-month imprisonment in default under prohibition statute section 61(1)(b). The court found the accused guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol and violating prohibition laws based on medical examination and evidence establishing intoxication and unlawful possession of liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case