THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JITENDRABHAI SARMANBHAI JOTAVA — 40/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN030001052026
e-Filing Number
28-01-2026
Filing Number
40/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203039250410
Police Station
MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.JITENDRABHAI SARMANBHAI JOTAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Jitendrabhai Sarmanbhai Jotava (CC 40/2026) The court convicted Jitendrabhai Sarmanbhai Jotava of violating regulations at his "Dream Forest Resort" by failing to maintain proper guest registers, failing to notify police of guest entries, and not obtaining required ID proofs from guests. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 (or three days simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), considering it his first offense and his economically disadvantaged circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 40/2026
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Jitendrabhai Sarmanbhai Jotava (CC 40/2026) The court convicted Jitendrabhai Sarmanbhai Jotava of violating regulations at his "Dream Forest Resort" by failing to maintain proper guest registers, failing to notify police of guest entries, and not obtaining required ID proofs from guests. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 (or three days simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid), considering it his first offense and his economically disadvantaged circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts