THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs Firoj Sulemanbhai Raniya Advocate - R M BALOLIYA — 21/2026
Case under Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 66(d). Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN030000782026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
21/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
21/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITAL
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203039260002
Police Station
MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Firoj Sulemanbhai Raniya Advocate - R M BALOLIYA
-
2.SHYAMBHAI MAHESHBHAI VASOYA
Adv. R M BALOLIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court convicted the accused under Indian Penal Code sections 317(3), 317(4), 34, and IPC section 55(d) for crimes related to cruelty and negligence. The judgment directs the accused to pay compensation and sentence them to imprisonment, while also ordering deletion of certain records and providing bail conditions pending final sentencing to be announced later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2026
The court convicted the accused under Indian Penal Code sections 317(3), 317(4), 34, and IPC section 55(d) for crimes related to cruelty and negligence. The judgment directs the accused to pay compensation and sentence them to imprisonment, while also ordering deletion of certain records and providing bail conditions pending final sentencing to be announced later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts