THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs Pramod Trikambhai Bhakhar Advocate - R M BALOLIYA — 20/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 317(3),317(4),54. Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN030000772026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
20/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
20/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MENDARDA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITAL
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203039260003
Police Station
MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pramod Trikambhai Bhakhar Advocate - R M BALOLIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Order
The court found the accused guilty under IPC Sections 317(3), 317(4), and 34 for abandoning a child with intent to cause death and criminal intimidation. The accused is sentenced to imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation to the victim, with the court finding that the accused's actions violated the child's right to protection under Indian law. The court directed the accused to surrender before the specified magistrate within the given timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Apr-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 20/2026
The court found the accused guilty under IPC Sections 317(3), 317(4), and 34 for abandoning a child with intent to cause death and criminal intimidation. The accused is sentenced to imprisonment and ordered to pay compensation to the victim, with the court finding that the accused's actions violated the child's right to protection under Indian law. The court directed the accused to surrender before the specified magistrate within the given timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts