Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI RAVJIBHAI KACHHADIYA Advocate - J.R.Joshi — 5387/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A). Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN020086402025

Filing Number

5387/2025

Filing Date

03-Nov-2025

Registration No

5387/2025

Registration Date

03-Nov-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203024250542

Police Station

JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184,185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYBHAI RAVJIBHAI KACHHADIYA Advocate - J.R.Joshi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 5387/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Junagadh, acquitted defendant Vijaybhai Ravjibhai Kachhadiya of charges under BNS Sections 281 and 337(a) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, and 185, giving him the benefit of doubt. Key Reasoning: While the court found credible evidence that a Bolero vehicle collided with a motorcycle on July 19, 2022, causing injuries to the complainant and witnesses, the prosecution failed to establish with reasonable certainty that the defendant's rash or negligent driving directly caused the accident. The complainant's own testimony suggested the Bolero was coming from the wrong side and the collision occurred during a conversation between parties, creating ambiguity about causation. Absent clear proof linking the defendant's culpability to the injuries, the court applied the presumption of innocence. Bail Terms: Defendant ordered to furnish ₹15,000 bail and personal recognizance bond of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 07-May-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 03-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5387/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 5387/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Junagadh, acquitted defendant Vijaybhai Ravjibhai Kachhadiya of charges under BNS Sections 281 and 337(a) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, and 185, giving him the benefit of doubt. Key Reasoning: While the court found credible evidence that a Bolero vehicle collided with a motorcycle on July 19, 2022, causing injuries to the complainant and witnesses, the prosecution failed to establish with reasonable certainty that the defendant's rash or negligent driving directly caused the accident. The complainant's own testimony suggested the Bolero was coming from the wrong side and the collision occurred during a conversation between parties, creating ambiguity about causation. Absent clear proof linking the defendant's culpability to the injuries, the court applied the presumption of innocence. Bail Terms: Defendant ordered to furnish ₹15,000 bail and personal recognizance bond of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case