Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI RAVJIBHAI KACHHADIYA Advocate - J.R.Joshi — 5387/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A). Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN020086402025

Case disposed

Filing Number

5387/2025

Filing Date

03-11-2025

Registration No

5387/2025

Registration Date

03-11-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203024250542

Police Station

JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184,185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

VIJAYBHAI RAVJIBHAI KACHHADIYA Advocate - J.R.Joshi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

08-05-2026

Disposed

07-05-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

02-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

08-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 5387/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Junagadh, acquitted defendant Vijaybhai Ravjibhai Kachhadiya of charges under BNS Sections 281 and 337(a) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, and 185, giving him the benefit of doubt. Key Reasoning: While the court found credible evidence that a Bolero vehicle collided with a motorcycle on July 19, 2022, causing injuries to the complainant and witnesses, the prosecution failed to establish with reasonable certainty that the defendant's rash or negligent driving directly caused the accident. The complainant's own testimony suggested the Bolero was coming from the wrong side and the collision occurred during a conversation between parties, creating ambiguity about causation. Absent clear proof linking the defendant's culpability to the injuries, the court applied the presumption of innocence. Bail Terms: Defendant ordered to furnish ₹15,000 bail and personal recognizance bond of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 5387/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Junagadh, acquitted defendant Vijaybhai Ravjibhai Kachhadiya of charges under BNS Sections 281 and 337(a) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, and 185, giving him the benefit of doubt. Key Reasoning: While the court found credible evidence that a Bolero vehicle collided with a motorcycle on July 19, 2022, causing injuries to the complainant and witnesses, the prosecution failed to establish with reasonable certainty that the defendant's rash or negligent driving directly caused the accident. The complainant's own testimony suggested the Bolero was coming from the wrong side and the collision occurred during a conversation between parties, creating ambiguity about causation. Absent clear proof linking the defendant's culpability to the injuries, the court applied the presumption of innocence. Bail Terms: Defendant ordered to furnish ₹15,000 bail and personal recognizance bond of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case