Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI RAVJIBHAI KACHHADIYA Advocate - J.R.Joshi — 5387/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A). Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN020086402025
Filing Number
5387/2025
Filing Date
03-11-2025
Registration No
5387/2025
Registration Date
03-11-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203024250542
Police Station
JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VIJAYBHAI RAVJIBHAI KACHHADIYA Advocate - J.R.Joshi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 09-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 5387/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Junagadh, acquitted defendant Vijaybhai Ravjibhai Kachhadiya of charges under BNS Sections 281 and 337(a) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, and 185, giving him the benefit of doubt. Key Reasoning: While the court found credible evidence that a Bolero vehicle collided with a motorcycle on July 19, 2022, causing injuries to the complainant and witnesses, the prosecution failed to establish with reasonable certainty that the defendant's rash or negligent driving directly caused the accident. The complainant's own testimony suggested the Bolero was coming from the wrong side and the collision occurred during a conversation between parties, creating ambiguity about causation. Absent clear proof linking the defendant's culpability to the injuries, the court applied the presumption of innocence. Bail Terms: Defendant ordered to furnish ₹15,000 bail and personal recognizance bond of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 5387/2025 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Junagadh, acquitted defendant Vijaybhai Ravjibhai Kachhadiya of charges under BNS Sections 281 and 337(a) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, and 185, giving him the benefit of doubt. Key Reasoning: While the court found credible evidence that a Bolero vehicle collided with a motorcycle on July 19, 2022, causing injuries to the complainant and witnesses, the prosecution failed to establish with reasonable certainty that the defendant's rash or negligent driving directly caused the accident. The complainant's own testimony suggested the Bolero was coming from the wrong side and the collision occurred during a conversation between parties, creating ambiguity about causation. Absent clear proof linking the defendant's culpability to the injuries, the court applied the presumption of innocence. Bail Terms: Defendant ordered to furnish ₹15,000 bail and personal recognizance bond of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts