Government of Gujarat vs RAHUL S/O PRAVINBHAI LABHUBHAI MAKVANA — 3906/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN020063462025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3906/2025

Filing Date

12-08-2025

Registration No

3906/2025

Registration Date

12-08-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203024250509

Police Station

JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAHUL S/O PRAVINBHAI LABHUBHAI MAKVANA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

23-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

12-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

01-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: 3906/2025 The High Court of Gujarat accepted the Government of Gujarat's petition to compound (withdraw) criminal charges against Rahul S/O Pravinbhai Labhubhai Makvana under IPC Section 303(2). The court held that compounding was permissible since the offence involved did not require the accused's consent and the prosecution had authority to proceed with the application. The court found no legal impediment to accepting the compounding request and accordingly discharged the accused from the charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 3906/2025 The High Court of Gujarat accepted the Government of Gujarat's petition to compound (withdraw) criminal charges against Rahul S/O Pravinbhai Labhubhai Makvana under IPC Section 303(2). The court held that compounding was permissible since the offence involved did not require the accused's consent and the prosecution had authority to proceed with the application. The court found no legal impediment to accepting the compounding request and accordingly discharged the accused from the charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case