STATE BANK OF INDIA vs GAURAV KAUSHIKBHAI TRIVEDI PROPRIETOR OF JAYNATH ENTERPRISE — 50/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.
COMM CS - COMMERCIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN020058412025
Filing Number
50/2025
Filing Date
29-07-2025
Registration No
50/2025
Registration Date
29-07-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BANK OF INDIA
Adv. V P PUROHIT
Respondent(s)
GAURAV KAUSHIKBHAI TRIVEDI PROPRIETOR OF JAYNATH ENTERPRISE
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
PETITIONER EVIDENCE
PETITIONER EVIDENCE
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT |
| 25-02-2026 | PETITIONER EVIDENCE |
| 11-02-2026 | PETITIONER EVIDENCE |
| 23-01-2026 | ISSUES |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Primary Senior Civil Court of Junagadh allowed State Bank of India's commercial suit against a defendant for recovery of an outstanding agricultural loan. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff bank, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 5,10,388/- (principal amount of Rs. 6,10,000/- borrowed as a term loan) plus 18% monthly compound interest from the date of filing until recovery, along with case costs. The court found sufficient documentary evidence (loan agreement, guarantee agreement, account statements) and oral testimony supporting the bank's claim that the defendant defaulted on loan repayment obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Primary Senior Civil Court of Junagadh allowed State Bank of India's commercial suit against a defendant for recovery of an outstanding agricultural loan. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff bank, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 5,10,388/- (principal amount of Rs. 6,10,000/- borrowed as a term loan) plus 18% monthly compound interest from the date of filing until recovery, along with case costs. The court found sufficient documentary evidence (loan agreement, guarantee agreement, account statements) and oral testimony supporting the bank's claim that the defendant defaulted on loan repayment obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts