STATE BANK OF INDIA vs GAURAV KAUSHIKBHAI TRIVEDI PROPRIETOR OF JAYNATH ENTERPRISE — 50/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 30th March 2026.

COMM CS - COMMERCIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJN020058412025

Case disposed

Filing Number

50/2025

Filing Date

29-07-2025

Registration No

50/2025

Registration Date

29-07-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9
THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015 Section 6

Petitioner(s)

STATE BANK OF INDIA

Adv. V P PUROHIT

Respondent(s)

GAURAV KAUSHIKBHAI TRIVEDI PROPRIETOR OF JAYNATH ENTERPRISE

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

30-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

ORDER/JUDGEMENT

25-02-2026

PETITIONER EVIDENCE

11-02-2026

PETITIONER EVIDENCE

23-01-2026

ISSUES

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Primary Senior Civil Court of Junagadh allowed State Bank of India's commercial suit against a defendant for recovery of an outstanding agricultural loan. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff bank, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 5,10,388/- (principal amount of Rs. 6,10,000/- borrowed as a term loan) plus 18% monthly compound interest from the date of filing until recovery, along with case costs. The court found sufficient documentary evidence (loan agreement, guarantee agreement, account statements) and oral testimony supporting the bank's claim that the defendant defaulted on loan repayment obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Primary Senior Civil Court of Junagadh allowed State Bank of India's commercial suit against a defendant for recovery of an outstanding agricultural loan. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff bank, directing the defendant to pay Rs. 5,10,388/- (principal amount of Rs. 6,10,000/- borrowed as a term loan) plus 18% monthly compound interest from the date of filing until recovery, along with case costs. The court found sufficient documentary evidence (loan agreement, guarantee agreement, account statements) and oral testimony supporting the bank's claim that the defendant defaulted on loan repayment obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case