Government of Gujarat vs FATEMABEN W/O MUSABHAI ISHAKBHAI MATAVA — 3501/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Status: PROCESS TO ACCUSED. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN020058172025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
3501/2025
Filing Date
29-07-2025
Registration No
3501/2025
Registration Date
29-07-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
8-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203004250285
Police Station
JUNAGADH C DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
FATEMABEN W/O MUSABHAI ISHAKBHAI MATAVA
JILUBEN D/O AARABBHAI SULEMANBHAI HINGOLA
SALMABEN D/O ABUBHAI OSMANBHAI SAMA
SHITALBEN W/O HARESHBHAI BHAGVANJIBHAI MAKHECHA
NURMABEN W/O IQBALBHAI BABUBHAI SIPAI
Hearing History
Judge: 8-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 10-04-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 14-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 20-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Interim Orders
Case 3501/2025 Summary The court convicted the three accused (Jiluben, Fatemaben, and Salmaben) under IPC Section 278 and Gambling Act Section 12 for illegal gambling. Each accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or face three days simple imprisonment in default; seized gambling materials were ordered destroyed, and the accused's claims to the seized property were rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 3501/2025 Summary The court convicted the three accused (Jiluben, Fatemaben, and Salmaben) under IPC Section 278 and Gambling Act Section 12 for illegal gambling. Each accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or face three days simple imprisonment in default; seized gambling materials were ordered destroyed, and the accused's claims to the seized property were rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts