Government of Gujarat vs TARIKBHAI KADARBHAI SHEKH Advocate - R.D.Hirani — 3033/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN020048942025

Filing Number

3033/2025

Filing Date

24-Jun-2025

Registration No

3033/2025

Registration Date

24-Jun-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203024250185

Police Station

JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TARIKBHAI KADARBHAI SHEKH Advocate - R.D.Hirani

  2. 2.YASIN URFE ZATPAT ANISBHAI SORATHIYA

    Adv. R.D.Hirani

  3. 3.AKRAM URFE MAYO IBRAHIMBHAI DHANANI

    Adv. R.D.Hirani

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 3033/2025 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM), Junagadh Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondents: Tarikbhai Kadarbhai Shekh, Yasin (Alias Zhatpat) Anisbhai Sorathiya, and Akram (Alias Mayo) Ibrahimbhai Dhanani --- Decision The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), 296(b) (obscene words in public), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation). The complainant failed to establish a watertight case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found significant gaps in the prosecution's evidence—including lack of credible witness corroboration, inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, and unsubstantiated documentary proof—and applied the principle that suspicion, however grave, cannot replace legal proof in criminal jurisprudence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 01-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 25-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 24-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 24-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3033/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 3033/2025 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM), Junagadh Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondents: Tarikbhai Kadarbhai Shekh, Yasin (Alias Zhatpat) Anisbhai Sorathiya, and Akram (Alias Mayo) Ibrahimbhai Dhanani --- Decision The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), 296(b) (obscene words in public), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation). The complainant failed to establish a watertight case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found significant gaps in the prosecution's evidence—including lack of credible witness corroboration, inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, and unsubstantiated documentary proof—and applied the principle that suspicion, however grave, cannot replace legal proof in criminal jurisprudence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case