Government of Gujarat vs TARIKBHAI KADARBHAI SHEKH Advocate - R.D.Hirani — 3033/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN020048942025
Filing Number
3033/2025
Filing Date
24-06-2025
Registration No
3033/2025
Registration Date
24-06-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203024250185
Police Station
JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
TARIKBHAI KADARBHAI SHEKH Advocate - R.D.Hirani
YASIN URFE ZATPAT ANISBHAI SORATHIYA
Adv. R.D.Hirani
AKRAM URFE MAYO IBRAHIMBHAI DHANANI
Adv. R.D.Hirani
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 05-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 24-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 3033/2025 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM), Junagadh Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondents: Tarikbhai Kadarbhai Shekh, Yasin (Alias Zhatpat) Anisbhai Sorathiya, and Akram (Alias Mayo) Ibrahimbhai Dhanani --- Decision The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), 296(b) (obscene words in public), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation). The complainant failed to establish a watertight case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found significant gaps in the prosecution's evidence—including lack of credible witness corroboration, inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, and unsubstantiated documentary proof—and applied the principle that suspicion, however grave, cannot replace legal proof in criminal jurisprudence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 3033/2025 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM), Junagadh Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondents: Tarikbhai Kadarbhai Shekh, Yasin (Alias Zhatpat) Anisbhai Sorathiya, and Akram (Alias Mayo) Ibrahimbhai Dhanani --- Decision The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), 296(b) (obscene words in public), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation). The complainant failed to establish a watertight case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found significant gaps in the prosecution's evidence—including lack of credible witness corroboration, inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, and unsubstantiated documentary proof—and applied the principle that suspicion, however grave, cannot replace legal proof in criminal jurisprudence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts