Government of Gujarat vs TARIKBHAI KADARBHAI SHEKH Advocate - R.D.Hirani — 3033/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN020048942025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3033/2025

Filing Date

24-06-2025

Registration No

3033/2025

Registration Date

24-06-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203024250185

Police Station

JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

TARIKBHAI KADARBHAI SHEKH Advocate - R.D.Hirani

YASIN URFE ZATPAT ANISBHAI SORATHIYA

Adv. R.D.Hirani

AKRAM URFE MAYO IBRAHIMBHAI DHANANI

Adv. R.D.Hirani

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

30-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

05-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

24-11-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 3033/2025 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM), Junagadh Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondents: Tarikbhai Kadarbhai Shekh, Yasin (Alias Zhatpat) Anisbhai Sorathiya, and Akram (Alias Mayo) Ibrahimbhai Dhanani --- Decision The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), 296(b) (obscene words in public), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation). The complainant failed to establish a watertight case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found significant gaps in the prosecution's evidence—including lack of credible witness corroboration, inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, and unsubstantiated documentary proof—and applied the principle that suspicion, however grave, cannot replace legal proof in criminal jurisprudence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 3033/2025 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM), Junagadh Petitioner: Government of Gujarat Respondents: Tarikbhai Kadarbhai Shekh, Yasin (Alias Zhatpat) Anisbhai Sorathiya, and Akram (Alias Mayo) Ibrahimbhai Dhanani --- Decision The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC Sections 115(2) (voluntarily causing hurt), 296(b) (obscene words in public), and 351(3) (criminal intimidation). The complainant failed to establish a watertight case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found significant gaps in the prosecution's evidence—including lack of credible witness corroboration, inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, and unsubstantiated documentary proof—and applied the principle that suspicion, however grave, cannot replace legal proof in criminal jurisprudence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case