Government of Gujarat vs JETUNBEN YUSUFBHAI KHEDARA Advocate - A K CHAUHAN — 2663/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),54,351(3),125(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN020041632025
Filing Number
2663/2025
Filing Date
22-05-2025
Registration No
2663/2025
Registration Date
22-05-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203024250052
Police Station
JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JETUNBEN YUSUFBHAI KHEDARA Advocate - A K CHAUHAN
MOSIN YUSUFBHAI KHEDARA
Adv. A K CHAUHAN
SOHIL AARIFBHAI KHEDARA
Adv. A K CHAUHAN
YUSUFBHAI AJIDBHAI KHEDARA
Adv. A K CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 05-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Criminal Case 2663/2025 The court acquitted all four accused persons (Jetunben Yusufbhai Khedara, Mosin Yusufbhai Khedara, Sohil Aarifbhai Khedara, and Yusufbhai Ajidbhai Khedara) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(3), 34, and 125(a), finding that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case beyond reasonable doubt despite documentary evidence, as the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration on material facts including specifics of abusive language, weapons involvement, and injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Criminal Case 2663/2025 The court acquitted all four accused persons (Jetunben Yusufbhai Khedara, Mosin Yusufbhai Khedara, Sohil Aarifbhai Khedara, and Yusufbhai Ajidbhai Khedara) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(3), 34, and 125(a), finding that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case beyond reasonable doubt despite documentary evidence, as the complainant's testimony lacked corroboration on material facts including specifics of abusive language, weapons involvement, and injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts