Government of Gujarat vs PRAGYESHBHAI KANDAS DANIDHARIYA — 1052/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN020015302026
Filing Number
1052/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
1052/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203024260169
Police Station
JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAGYESHBHAI KANDAS DANIDHARIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 1052/2026 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Junagadh convicted respondent Pragyeshbhai Kandas Danidhariya under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent act endangering human life) for recklessly operating a vehicle on Jhanpur Road on 04/03/2025, creating a video reel on social media without regard for public safety. The court sentenced the accused to six months imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹500, considering it his first offense while emphasizing reformation and deterrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1052/2026
Case Summary: 1052/2026 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Junagadh convicted respondent Pragyeshbhai Kandas Danidhariya under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent act endangering human life) for recklessly operating a vehicle on Jhanpur Road on 04/03/2025, creating a video reel on social media without regard for public safety. The court sentenced the accused to six months imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹500, considering it his first offense while emphasizing reformation and deterrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts