Government of Gujarat vs RAFIKBHAI FARUKBHAI BANAVA Advocate - N B LAKHANI — 1034/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN020015022026

Filing Number

1034/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

1034/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

7-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203004260016

Police Station

JUNAGADH C DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 131

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAFIKBHAI FARUKBHAI BANAVA Advocate - N B LAKHANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused (Rafikbhai Farukbhai Banava) under IPC Section 223 and Gujarat Police Act Section 131 for selling prohibited narcotics in Junagadh city. The court sentenced him to five months imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500, or an additional seven days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment, while rejecting his pleas for leniency based on poverty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1034/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused (Rafikbhai Farukbhai Banava) under IPC Section 223 and Gujarat Police Act Section 131 for selling prohibited narcotics in Junagadh city. The court sentenced him to five months imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500, or an additional seven days simple imprisonment in default of fine payment, while rejecting his pleas for leniency based on poverty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case