BHARATKUMAR MAHETA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 257/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJJN020014952026

Filing Number

257/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

257/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

7-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARATKUMAR MAHETA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMA 257/2026 Bharatkumar Maheta vs. Government of Gujarat Decision: The court approved the petitioner's plea and ordered the return of seized funds totaling ₹79,894 (old land record amount) held in police custody, along with the release of frozen bank accounts containing ₹79,894 across seven banks. The court found the petitioner entitled to recovery of funds seized during a cyber fraud investigation where he was the victim, not the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 257/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA 257/2026 Bharatkumar Maheta vs. Government of Gujarat Decision: The court approved the petitioner's plea and ordered the return of seized funds totaling ₹79,894 (old land record amount) held in police custody, along with the release of frozen bank accounts containing ₹79,894 across seven banks. The court found the petitioner entitled to recovery of funds seized during a cyber fraud investigation where he was the victim, not the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case