ANKITABEN VAJA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 256/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJJN020014942026

Filing Number

256/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

256/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

7-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANKITABEN VAJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 256/2026 The court approved petitioner Ankitaben Vaja's petition regarding seizure of Rs.5,500 from her State Bank of India account during a cyber fraud investigation. The court ordered the frozen funds be returned to the petitioner's account within 10 days, with conditions that the money remains available for court proceedings and cannot be used for unlawful purposes. The court exercised discretionary authority under CrPC Sections 457 and 503 to return the seized amount while maintaining judicial oversight over the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 256/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 256/2026 The court approved petitioner Ankitaben Vaja's petition regarding seizure of Rs.5,500 from her State Bank of India account during a cyber fraud investigation. The court ordered the frozen funds be returned to the petitioner's account within 10 days, with conditions that the money remains available for court proceedings and cannot be used for unlawful purposes. The court exercised discretionary authority under CrPC Sections 457 and 503 to return the seized amount while maintaining judicial oversight over the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case