BHATT CHANDRESHBHAI KESHAVBHAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 254/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJJN020014922026
Filing Number
254/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
254/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
7-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHATT CHANDRESHBHAI KESHAVBHAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 254/2026 Court Decision: The court granted the petitioner Bhatt Chandreshbhai Keshavbhai's petition under CrPC Sections 457 and 503, ordering return of Rs. 10,000 in cash seized during a cybercrime investigation. The court directed police to return the seized amount within 10 days and ordered banks to unfreeze Rs. 10,000 from frozen accounts (Federal Bank and Canara Bank) into the petitioner's State Bank account, with conditions that the funds remain available for court proceedings and the petitioner cannot misuse them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 254/2026
Summary of Case 254/2026 Court Decision: The court granted the petitioner Bhatt Chandreshbhai Keshavbhai's petition under CrPC Sections 457 and 503, ordering return of Rs. 10,000 in cash seized during a cybercrime investigation. The court directed police to return the seized amount within 10 days and ordered banks to unfreeze Rs. 10,000 from frozen accounts (Federal Bank and Canara Bank) into the petitioner's State Bank account, with conditions that the funds remain available for court proceedings and the petitioner cannot misuse them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts