UMESH JILKA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 252/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJJN020014902026

Filing Number

252/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

7-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESH JILKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court approved petitioner Umesh Jilka's petition, ordering the return of Rs.22,200 fraudulently withdrawn from his bank accounts (Gujarat Gramin Bank and State Bank of India) through a cyber fraud involving multiple transfers to Axis Bank accounts. The court directed the police to freeze and return the seized funds to the petitioner's account within 10 days, subject to conditions that the petitioner not misuse the funds and that any subsequent claims on the amount be properly adjudicated through legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court approved petitioner Umesh Jilka's petition, ordering the return of Rs.22,200 fraudulently withdrawn from his bank accounts (Gujarat Gramin Bank and State Bank of India) through a cyber fraud involving multiple transfers to Axis Bank accounts. The court directed the police to freeze and return the seized funds to the petitioner's account within 10 days, subject to conditions that the petitioner not misuse the funds and that any subsequent claims on the amount be properly adjudicated through legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case