IMANI ABBAS vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 251/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJJN020014892026
Filing Number
251/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
251/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
7-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
IMANI ABBAS
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 7-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA 251/2026 - Imani Abbas v. Government of Gujarat The petitioner, Imani Abbas, sought return of Rs. 11,200 seized from her Kotak Mahindra Bank account during a cyber fraud investigation. The court found that Rs. 6,200 and Rs. 5,000 were frozen in Punjab National Bank accounts under Section 106 BNSS. The magistrate approved return of the seized amount to the petitioner as she was the lawful owner, ordering the banks to unfreeze the funds and directing police to provide necessary documentation within 10 days. The court held that under Section 457 CrPC, seized property should be returned to the person entitled to possession, particularly when investigation revealed no wrongdoing by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA 251/2026 - Imani Abbas v. Government of Gujarat The petitioner, Imani Abbas, sought return of Rs. 11,200 seized from her Kotak Mahindra Bank account during a cyber fraud investigation. The court found that Rs. 6,200 and Rs. 5,000 were frozen in Punjab National Bank accounts under Section 106 BNSS. The magistrate approved return of the seized amount to the petitioner as she was the lawful owner, ordering the banks to unfreeze the funds and directing police to provide necessary documentation within 10 days. The court held that under Section 457 CrPC, seized property should be returned to the person entitled to possession, particularly when investigation revealed no wrongdoing by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts