IMANI ABBAS vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 251/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJJN020014892026

Filing Number

251/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

251/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

7-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IMANI ABBAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMA 251/2026 - Imani Abbas v. Government of Gujarat The petitioner, Imani Abbas, sought return of Rs. 11,200 seized from her Kotak Mahindra Bank account during a cyber fraud investigation. The court found that Rs. 6,200 and Rs. 5,000 were frozen in Punjab National Bank accounts under Section 106 BNSS. The magistrate approved return of the seized amount to the petitioner as she was the lawful owner, ordering the banks to unfreeze the funds and directing police to provide necessary documentation within 10 days. The court held that under Section 457 CrPC, seized property should be returned to the person entitled to possession, particularly when investigation revealed no wrongdoing by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA 251/2026 - Imani Abbas v. Government of Gujarat The petitioner, Imani Abbas, sought return of Rs. 11,200 seized from her Kotak Mahindra Bank account during a cyber fraud investigation. The court found that Rs. 6,200 and Rs. 5,000 were frozen in Punjab National Bank accounts under Section 106 BNSS. The magistrate approved return of the seized amount to the petitioner as she was the lawful owner, ordering the banks to unfreeze the funds and directing police to provide necessary documentation within 10 days. The court held that under Section 457 CrPC, seized property should be returned to the person entitled to possession, particularly when investigation revealed no wrongdoing by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case