GOVINDBHAI LAKHMANBHAI PITHIYA HEIRS OF LT.LAKHMAN ARJANBHAI PITHIYA vs JETHABHAI ARJANBHAI NANDANIYA — 32/2015
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 20th March 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN020004082015
Next Hearing
20th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
32/2015
Filing Date
01-05-2015
Registration No
32/2015
Registration Date
01-05-2015
Court
CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVINDBHAI LAKHMANBHAI PITHIYA HEIRS OF LT.LAKHMAN ARJANBHAI PITHIYA
Adv. R.L.HIRPARA
PITHABHAI LAKHMANBHAI PITHIYA
Adv. R.L.HIRPARA
MENSIBHAI LAKHMANBHAI PITHIYA
Adv. R.L.HIRPARA
MANJUBEN LAKHMANBHAI PITHIYA
Adv. R.L.HIRPARA
LABHUBEN LAKHMANBHAI PITHIYA
Adv. R.L.HIRPARA
JIVIBEN LAKHMANBHAI PITHIYA
Adv. R.L.HIRPARA
LAXMIBEN LAKHMANBHAI PITHIYA
Adv. R.L.HIRPARA
Respondent(s)
JETHABHAI ARJANBHAI NANDANIYA
KAMLABEN LAKHMANBHAI NANDANIYA
MANSUKHBHAI PARBATBHAI VADUKAT
RITABEN NILESHBHAI CHANDEGARA
Adv. K.B.SANGHAVI
MANSUKHBHAI LALJIBHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 13-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 06-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 02-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 20-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The Gujarat High Court rejected the plaintiff's petition for a mandatory decree and interim relief regarding disputed agricultural land properties. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the property ownership records and documentary evidence presented did not conclusively support the plaintiff's claims against the defendants. The petition was dismissed with directions to preserve the existing status quo of the disputed properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat High Court rejected the plaintiff's petition for a mandatory decree and interim relief regarding disputed agricultural land properties. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the property ownership records and documentary evidence presented did not conclusively support the plaintiff's claims against the defendants. The petition was dismissed with directions to preserve the existing status quo of the disputed properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts