DEVRAJ MOHAN MONPARA vs KHIMA RATNA MONPARA Advocate - R.B.CHAUHAN — 172/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 001. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 27th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN020003232015
Filing Number
172/2015
Filing Date
31-Jul-2015
Registration No
172/2015
Registration Date
31-Jul-2015
Court
CIVIL COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
7-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEVRAJ MOHAN MONPARA
Adv. C B SONIGARA
-
2.MANSUKH MOHAN MONPARA
Adv. C B SONIGARA
-
3.ARVIND MOHAN MONPARA
Adv. C B SONIGARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.KHIMA RATNA MONPARA Advocate - R.B.CHAUHAN
-
2.AMIT RANCHHOD KARKAR
Adv. J V PATANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 172/2015 Court: 2nd Additional Senior Civil Court, Junagadh Parties: - Plaintiffs: Devraj Mohan Monpara, Mansukh Mohan Monpara, Arvind Mohan Monpara - Defendants: Khima Ratna Monpara and others Core Issue: A dispute over ancestral agricultural land involving questions of property ownership, inheritance, partition, and rightful possession following a family division. Key Holdings: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for recovery of ancestral land (Survey Nos. 66, 388, 388, 502/1, and 501) based on the following determinations: 1. Ancestral Property Transfer: The evidence established that the disputed land was ancestral property validly partitioned and transferred among family members through documented divisions (Khatian Nos. 10, 29, 506, and 1638). 2. Adverse Possession Defense: The defendants successfully demonstrated that they possessed the disputed portions for over 30 years with the knowledge and acquiescence of the plaintiffs' father, satisfying the requirements for adverse possession. 3. Defective Survey Maps: Maps produced by the plaintiffs were unproven and inaccurate, lacking the necessary official validation or credible evidence of their accuracy, per Section 83 of the Indian Evidence Act. 4. Statute of Limitations: The plaintiffs' delayed claim (48 years after the alleged encroachment) constituted laches, and they failed to establish any recent discovery justifying the delay. 5. No Encroachment Proven: The court found that the defendants held rightful shares in the contested land under valid prior divisions, not through wrongful encroachment. Decree: All relief sought by the plaintiffs was denied with proportionate cost distribution between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Oct-2025
Defendant Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
21-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Jul-2025
Defendant Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Jul-2025
Defendant Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Jun-2025
Defendant Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Jun-2025
Defendant Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-May-2025
Defendant Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Apr-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Mar-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Mar-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Jan-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Dec-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Nov-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Nov-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Oct-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Sep-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Aug-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Jul-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jun-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Apr-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Feb-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Jan-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Dec-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Oct-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Sep-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Aug-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Jul-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Jun-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Apr-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Mar-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Feb-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Dec-2022
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
14-Nov-2022
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
26-Sep-2022
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Aug-2022
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
11-Jul-2022
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-May-2022
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
07-Apr-2022
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
10-Mar-2022
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
02-Feb-2022
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-Jan-2022
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Dec-2021
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Nov-2021
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
07-Oct-2021
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
31-Aug-2021
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
31-Jul-2021
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Jun-2021
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
20-Apr-2021
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-Mar-2021
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
12-Feb-2021
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
30-Jan-2021
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Jan-2021
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
10-Dec-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
28-Oct-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-Sep-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
10-Aug-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
14-Jul-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
30-Jun-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
02-Jun-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-May-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-May-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Apr-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
02-Mar-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
10-Feb-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Feb-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-Jan-2020
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
31-Dec-2019
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Dec-2019
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
30-Nov-2019
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
14-Nov-2019
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
15-Oct-2019
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Oct-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
03-Sep-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Jul-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
29-Jun-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-May-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Apr-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
28-Mar-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-Mar-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-Jan-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Dec-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
20-Nov-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Oct-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
27-Sep-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Sep-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Jul-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
20-Jun-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
30-Apr-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
02-Apr-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Mar-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Feb-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Jan-2018
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Dec-2017
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
20-Nov-2017
Plaintiff Evidence
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Oct-2017
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Sep-2017
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Aug-2017
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Jul-2017
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Jul-2017
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
17-Apr-2017
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Jan-2017
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Nov-2016
Plaintiff Evidence
3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Oct-2016
Plaintiff Evidence
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Jun-2016
Plaintiff Evidence
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Apr-2016
Issues
4th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Feb-2016
Issues
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
29-Dec-2015
Issues
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
14-Oct-2015
Issues
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Sep-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jul-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 172/2015
Case Summary: 172/2015 Court: 2nd Additional Senior Civil Court, Junagadh Parties: - Plaintiffs: Devraj Mohan Monpara, Mansukh Mohan Monpara, Arvind Mohan Monpara - Defendants: Khima Ratna Monpara and others Core Issue: A dispute over ancestral agricultural land involving questions of property ownership, inheritance, partition, and rightful possession following a family division. Key Holdings: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for recovery of ancestral land (Survey Nos. 66, 388, 388, 502/1, and 501) based on the following determinations: 1. Ancestral Property Transfer: The evidence established that the disputed land was ancestral property validly partitioned and transferred among family members through documented divisions (Khatian Nos. 10, 29, 506, and 1638). 2. Adverse Possession Defense: The defendants successfully demonstrated that they possessed the disputed portions for over 30 years with the knowledge and acquiescence of the plaintiffs' father, satisfying the requirements for adverse possession. 3. Defective Survey Maps: Maps produced by the plaintiffs were unproven and inaccurate, lacking the necessary official validation or credible evidence of their accuracy, per Section 83 of the Indian Evidence Act. 4. Statute of Limitations: The plaintiffs' delayed claim (48 years after the alleged encroachment) constituted laches, and they failed to establish any recent discovery justifying the delay. 5. No Encroachment Proven: The court found that the defendants held rightful shares in the contested land under valid prior divisions, not through wrongful encroachment. Decree: All relief sought by the plaintiffs was denied with proportionate cost distribution between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts