MANOJ TRADING COMPANY, PROPRITER, MANOJKUMAR SANABHAI PARAJAPATIi vs SWASTIK PROTEINS PROPRITER CHUNIBHAI RAVAJIBHAI RAKHOLIA Advocate - D D RUPARELIA — 162/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 10th April 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJJN010026512025

Case disposedSub Stage

Filing Number

162/2025

Filing Date

26-12-2025

Registration No

162/2025

Registration Date

26-12-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415

Petitioner(s)

MANOJ TRADING COMPANY, PROPRITER, MANOJKUMAR SANABHAI PARAJAPATIi

Adv. K S BORICHANGAR

Respondent(s)

SWASTIK PROTEINS PROPRITER CHUNIBHAI RAVAJIBHAI RAKHOLIA Advocate - D D RUPARELIA

Government of Gujarat

Adv. M P VAGHELA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

10-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

ORDER

16-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

ORDER

28-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 162/2025 Court's Decision: The appellate court set aside the trial court's conviction and sentence against the appellant (Manoj Trading Company's proprietor). The court found serious procedural irregularities: the accused's cross-examination was not conducted despite being afforded opportunity, he remained absent for extended periods without proper warrant enforcement, and the trial court failed to properly evaluate evidence before convicting him under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. The court remanded the case for retrial with directions for proper cross-examination of the complainant, fresh evidence presentation by both parties, and judicial discretion on bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

26-12-2025
ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 162/2025 Court's Decision: The appellate court set aside the trial court's conviction and sentence against the appellant (Manoj Trading Company's proprietor). The court found serious procedural irregularities: the accused's cross-examination was not conducted despite being afforded opportunity, he remained absent for extended periods without proper warrant enforcement, and the trial court failed to properly evaluate evidence before convicting him under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. The court remanded the case for retrial with directions for proper cross-examination of the complainant, fresh evidence presentation by both parties, and judicial discretion on bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case