MANOJ TRADING COMPANY, PROPRITER, MANOJKUMAR SANABHAI PARAJAPATIi vs SWASTIK PROTEINS PROPRITER CHUNIBHAI RAVAJIBHAI RAKHOLIA Advocate - D D RUPARELIA — 162/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 10th April 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJJN010026512025

Filing Number

162/2025

Filing Date

26-Dec-2025

Registration No

162/2025

Registration Date

26-Dec-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ TRADING COMPANY, PROPRITER, MANOJKUMAR SANABHAI PARAJAPATIi

    Adv. K S BORICHANGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SWASTIK PROTEINS PROPRITER CHUNIBHAI RAVAJIBHAI RAKHOLIA Advocate - D D RUPARELIA

  2. 2.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. M P VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 162/2025 Court's Decision: The appellate court set aside the trial court's conviction and sentence against the appellant (Manoj Trading Company's proprietor). The court found serious procedural irregularities: the accused's cross-examination was not conducted despite being afforded opportunity, he remained absent for extended periods without proper warrant enforcement, and the trial court failed to properly evaluate evidence before convicting him under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. The court remanded the case for retrial with directions for proper cross-examination of the complainant, fresh evidence presentation by both parties, and judicial discretion on bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District Judge

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  10. 12-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  11. 02-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  12. 23-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  13. 13-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  14. 12-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  15. 26-Dec-2025

    Order

  16. 26-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 26-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 162/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 162/2025 Court's Decision: The appellate court set aside the trial court's conviction and sentence against the appellant (Manoj Trading Company's proprietor). The court found serious procedural irregularities: the accused's cross-examination was not conducted despite being afforded opportunity, he remained absent for extended periods without proper warrant enforcement, and the trial court failed to properly evaluate evidence before convicting him under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. The court remanded the case for retrial with directions for proper cross-examination of the complainant, fresh evidence presentation by both parties, and judicial discretion on bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case