Government of Gujarat vs PARIT BHAGVANJIBHAI KANERIYA Advocate - S D CHAGLANI — 842/2025
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 15th April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010025552025
Filing Number
842/2025
Filing Date
12-12-2025
Registration No
842/2025
Registration Date
12-12-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. V N MADHAK
Respondent(s)
PARIT BHAGVANJIBHAI KANERIYA Advocate - S D CHAGLANI
DAXABEN BHAGVANJIBHAI KANERIYA
Adv. S D CHAGLANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 04-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Junagadh Sessions Court granted the State's application to condone a 115-day delay in filing an appeal against the acquittal of two defendants in a domestic violence case (IPC Sections 498(A), 323, 504, 114). However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 2,500 payable to the opponents, citing administrative delays in obtaining sanction and rectifying case number errors as justified grounds. The court balanced substantial justice against technical procedural requirements, allowing the appeal to proceed on merits while ensuring accountability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Junagadh Sessions Court granted the State's application to condone a 115-day delay in filing an appeal against the acquittal of two defendants in a domestic violence case (IPC Sections 498(A), 323, 504, 114). However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 2,500 payable to the opponents, citing administrative delays in obtaining sanction and rectifying case number errors as justified grounds. The court balanced substantial justice against technical procedural requirements, allowing the appeal to proceed on merits while ensuring accountability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts