Government of Gujarat vs PARIT BHAGVANJIBHAI KANERIYA Advocate - S D CHAGLANI — 842/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 15th April 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN010025552025

Case disposed

Filing Number

842/2025

Filing Date

12-12-2025

Registration No

842/2025

Registration Date

12-12-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. V N MADHAK

Respondent(s)

PARIT BHAGVANJIBHAI KANERIYA Advocate - S D CHAGLANI

DAXABEN BHAGVANJIBHAI KANERIYA

Adv. S D CHAGLANI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

15-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

HEARING

04-04-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The Junagadh Sessions Court granted the State's application to condone a 115-day delay in filing an appeal against the acquittal of two defendants in a domestic violence case (IPC Sections 498(A), 323, 504, 114). However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 2,500 payable to the opponents, citing administrative delays in obtaining sanction and rectifying case number errors as justified grounds. The court balanced substantial justice against technical procedural requirements, allowing the appeal to proceed on merits while ensuring accountability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Junagadh Sessions Court granted the State's application to condone a 115-day delay in filing an appeal against the acquittal of two defendants in a domestic violence case (IPC Sections 498(A), 323, 504, 114). However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 2,500 payable to the opponents, citing administrative delays in obtaining sanction and rectifying case number errors as justified grounds. The court balanced substantial justice against technical procedural requirements, allowing the appeal to proceed on merits while ensuring accountability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case