SURESHBHAI RAMANBHAI PARMAR vs DIPAK DEVJIBHAI CHUDASAMA DRIVER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910 Advocate - M K MIYATRA — 279/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJJN010023332025
Filing Number
279/2025
Filing Date
13-Nov-2025
Registration No
279/2025
Registration Date
13-Nov-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESHBHAI RAMANBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K L SANCHELA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIPAK DEVJIBHAI CHUDASAMA DRIVER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910 Advocate - M K MIYATRA
-
2.MAHESH KANJIBHAI CHUDASAMA OWNER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910
Adv. M K MIYATRA
-
3.THE I.C.I.C.I. GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. M C JANI
-
4.KAJI MAGANBHAI KALMI DRIVER/OWNER OF RIXA NO. GJ-11-UU-0258
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary The National Lok Adalat, Junagadh disposed of MACP No. 279/2025 by allowing withdrawal of the petition after the parties reached a settlement through mediation at the Mediation Center. The court ordered refund of court fees to the claimant and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 279/2025
Summary The National Lok Adalat, Junagadh disposed of MACP No. 279/2025 by allowing withdrawal of the petition after the parties reached a settlement through mediation at the Mediation Center. The court ordered refund of court fees to the claimant and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts