MANISHABEN SURESHBHAI PARMAR vs DIPAK DEVJIBHAI CHUDASAMA DRIVER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910 Advocate - M K MIYATRA — 278/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJJN010023322025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
278/2025
Filing Date
13-11-2025
Registration No
278/2025
Registration Date
13-11-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANISHABEN SURESHBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K L SANCHELA
Respondent(s)
DIPAK DEVJIBHAI CHUDASAMA DRIVER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910 Advocate - M K MIYATRA
MAHESH KANJIBHAI CHUDASAMA OWNER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910
Adv. M K MIYATRA
THE I.C.I.C.I. GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. M C JANI
KAJI MAGANBHAI KALMI DRIVER/OWNER OF RIXA NO. GJ-11-UU-0258
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 31-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Junagadh) accepted a compromise settlement between the claimant and insurance company for Rs. 2,25,000 as full and final compensation, disposing of the claim petition through National Lok-Adalat mediation. The insurance company was directed to deposit the amount with the tribunal without deducting court fees, and the settlement will not operate as res judicata for any other claims arising from the same vehicular accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Junagadh) accepted a compromise settlement between the claimant and insurance company for Rs. 2,25,000 as full and final compensation, disposing of the claim petition through National Lok-Adalat mediation. The insurance company was directed to deposit the amount with the tribunal without deducting court fees, and the settlement will not operate as res judicata for any other claims arising from the same vehicular accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts