MOJIBHAI MAGANBHAI KALMI ALIAS KALMI vs DIPAK DEVJIBHAI CHUDASAMA DRIVER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910 Advocate - M K MIYATRA — 275/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJJN010023292025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
275/2025
Filing Date
13-11-2025
Registration No
275/2025
Registration Date
13-11-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOJIBHAI MAGANBHAI KALMI ALIAS KALMI
Adv. K L SANCHELA
Respondent(s)
DIPAK DEVJIBHAI CHUDASAMA DRIVER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910 Advocate - M K MIYATRA
MAHESH KANJIBHAI CHUDASAMA OWNER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910
Adv. M K MIYATRA
THE I.C.I.C.I. GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. M C JANI
KAJI MAGANBHAI KALMI DRIVER/OWNER OF RIXA NO. GJ-11-UU-0258
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 17-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 31-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The MAC Tribunal at Junagadh disposed of claim petition MACP No.275/2025 by accepting a compromise settlement between the claimant and insurance company for Rs.20,000 reached through National Lok-Adalat mediation. The tribunal directed the insurance company to deposit this amount as full and final compensation, with no court fee deduction, and noted that the compromise does not operate as res judicata for other claims arising from the same vehicular accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The MAC Tribunal at Junagadh disposed of claim petition MACP No.275/2025 by accepting a compromise settlement between the claimant and insurance company for Rs.20,000 reached through National Lok-Adalat mediation. The tribunal directed the insurance company to deposit this amount as full and final compensation, with no court fee deduction, and noted that the compromise does not operate as res judicata for other claims arising from the same vehicular accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts