KAJIBHAI MAGANBHAI KALMI vs DIPAK DEVJIBHAI CHUDASAMA DRIVER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910 Advocate - M K MIYATRA — 272/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJJN010023262025
Filing Number
272/2025
Filing Date
13-Nov-2025
Registration No
272/2025
Registration Date
13-Nov-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAJIBHAI MAGANBHAI KALMI
Adv. K L SANCHELA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIPAK DEVJIBHAI CHUDASAMA DRIVER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910 Advocate - M K MIYATRA
-
2.MAHESH KANJIBHAI CHUDASAMA OWNER OF MOTER CYCLE GJ-11-CG-3910
Adv. M K MIYATRA
-
3.THE I.C.I.C.I. GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. M C JANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The Junagadh National Lok-Adalat disposed of petition MACP No.272/2025 by accepting a compromise settlement reached through mediation between the claimant and defendant. The court allowed the claimant's withdrawal of the petition, directed issuance of a court fee refund certificate if applicable, and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Written Statement/Reply
Principal District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
13-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 272/2025
Summary: The Junagadh National Lok-Adalat disposed of petition MACP No.272/2025 by accepting a compromise settlement reached through mediation between the claimant and defendant. The court allowed the claimant's withdrawal of the petition, directed issuance of a court fee refund certificate if applicable, and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts