PUNABHAI ARJANBHAI BHARVAD vs SARPANCHSHRI THROUGH NAJAPUR GRAMPANCHAYAT Advocate - K B PIPALIA — 37/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 13th May 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJJN010018152025
Filing Number
37/2025
Filing Date
29-Aug-2025
Registration No
37/2025
Registration Date
29-Aug-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUNABHAI ARJANBHAI BHARVAD
Adv. D H LATHIGARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SARPANCHSHRI THROUGH NAJAPUR GRAMPANCHAYAT Advocate - K B PIPALIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Judegement
-
13-May-2026
Judegement
Case Summary The Principal District Judge, Junagadh, dismissed an appeal challenging a lower court's rejection of a man's suit claiming ownership of disputed land through adverse possession. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove adverse possession because he did not specify when possession became hostile to the Gram Panchayat (local authority) and did not establish that the land was vested in the Panchayat rather than the State Government—requiring 30 years of possession instead of 12. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
30-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal District Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
For Arguement of opponent
Principal District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
29-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2025
Case Summary The Principal District Judge, Junagadh, dismissed an appeal challenging a lower court's rejection of a man's suit claiming ownership of disputed land through adverse possession. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove adverse possession because he did not specify when possession became hostile to the Gram Panchayat (local authority) and did not establish that the land was vested in the Panchayat rather than the State Government—requiring 30 years of possession instead of 12. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts