VADHER ASHOKBHAI BHANJIBHAI vs UNAGADH SUVIDHA CREDIT CO.OPP. SO.LTD THROUGH DHARMESHBHAI SHAMALJIBHAI SEJPAL Advocate - V V HEDAU — 102/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(1). Status: FINAL HEARING. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJJN010015982025
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
102/2025
Filing Date
30-07-2025
Registration No
102/2025
Registration Date
30-07-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VADHER ASHOKBHAI BHANJIBHAI
Adv. S K MEHTA
Respondent(s)
UNAGADH SUVIDHA CREDIT CO.OPP. SO.LTD THROUGH DHARMESHBHAI SHAMALJIBHAI SEJPAL Advocate - V V HEDAU
Government of Gujarat
Adv. V N MADHAK
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 18-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 28-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 02-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 12-12-2025 | FINAL HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary The appeal against the conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Section 138 cheque bouncing case) is partially allowed. The sentence of two years simple imprisonment is suspended, and the appellant is granted bail on condition of depositing 20% of the cheque amount (₹15,000) and furnishing a personal bond of equal amount until the final disposal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The appeal against the conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Section 138 cheque bouncing case) is partially allowed. The sentence of two years simple imprisonment is suspended, and the appellant is granted bail on condition of depositing 20% of the cheque amount (₹15,000) and furnishing a personal bond of equal amount until the final disposal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts