RANJITSINH RAVAT VALA vs Government of Gujarat THROUGH COLLECTOR SHREE Advocate - J M DEVANI — 26/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJJN010011752022

Filing Number

26/2022

Filing Date

27-Jul-2022

Registration No

26/2022

Registration Date

27-Jul-2022

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJITSINH RAVAT VALA

    Adv. N S SHETH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat THROUGH COLLECTOR SHREE Advocate - J M DEVANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Principal District Judge of Junagadh dismissed the plaintiff's appeal and upheld the trial court's decision, ruling that the plaintiff failed to prove ownership of a disputed 900-square-yard property in Bilkha village. The court found that since Bilkha State merged with the Union of India in August 1947, the then-ruler (plaintiff's father) had no authority to execute a valid sale deed in February 1948, making the plaintiff's ownership claim invalid and denying his plea for possession and mesne profits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Principal District Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Principal District Judge

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  11. 24-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  12. 21-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  13. 31-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  14. 16-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  15. 02-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  16. 18-Jun-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  17. 23-May-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  18. 08-May-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  19. 23-Apr-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  20. 06-Mar-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  21. 19-Feb-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  22. 12-Feb-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  23. 29-Jan-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  24. 22-Jan-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  25. 01-Jan-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  26. 18-Dec-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  27. 11-Dec-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  28. 04-Dec-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  29. 27-Nov-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  30. 22-Nov-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  31. 14-Nov-2024

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Principal District Judge

  32. 23-Oct-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  33. 04-Sep-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  34. 06-Aug-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  35. 18-Jul-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  36. 20-Jun-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  37. 25-Apr-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  38. 21-Mar-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  39. 15-Feb-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  40. 22-Jan-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  41. 26-Dec-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  42. 22-Nov-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  43. 19-Oct-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  44. 22-Sep-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  45. 24-Aug-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  46. 26-Jul-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  47. 30-Jun-2023

    Final Arguments

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  48. 22-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  49. 30-May-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  50. 16-May-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  51. 05-May-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  52. 17-Apr-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  53. 27-Mar-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  54. 27-Feb-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  55. 23-Jan-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  56. 26-Dec-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  57. 12-Dec-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  58. 15-Nov-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  59. 10-Oct-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  60. 05-Sep-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  61. 17-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  62. 27-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District Judge of Junagadh dismissed the plaintiff's appeal and upheld the trial court's decision, ruling that the plaintiff failed to prove ownership of a disputed 900-square-yard property in Bilkha village. The court found that since Bilkha State merged with the Union of India in August 1947, the then-ruler (plaintiff's father) had no authority to execute a valid sale deed in February 1948, making the plaintiff's ownership claim invalid and denying his plea for possession and mesne profits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case