VAJA SHARDABEN CHIMANLAL CHAVDA POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER CHIMANLAL DURLABHJI CHAVDA vs HITESHBHAI BABUBHAI RAVAL HEIRS OF LT BABUBHAI GIRDHARBHAI RAVAL Advocate - K B SANGHAVI — 47/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJJN010010312025

Filing Number

47/2025

Filing Date

07-May-2025

Registration No

47/2025

Registration Date

07-May-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VAJA SHARDABEN CHIMANLAL CHAVDA POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER CHIMANLAL DURLABHJI CHAVDA

    Adv. R B MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HITESHBHAI BABUBHAI RAVAL HEIRS OF LT BABUBHAI GIRDHARBHAI RAVAL Advocate - K B SANGHAVI

  2. 2.AJAYBHAI BABUBHAI RAVAL HEIRS OF LT BABUBHAI GIRDHARBHAI RAVAL

    Adv. K B SANGHAVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of CMA No. 47/2025 The Principal District Judge of Junagadh allowed the applicant's delay condonation application. The applicant had filed two suits (271/2017 and 272/2017) seeking eviction of tenants, both dismissed. Due to a bona fide mistake, withdrawal was filed in one appeal while arguments were submitted in another. The applicant sought condonation for a 16-month delay in filing a review petition, citing ill health. The court granted the application based on the Supreme Court's B. Madhuri Goud precedent favoring substantial justice over technical grounds, and imposed costs of Rs. 15,000 payable to opponents within 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Order

    Principal District Judge

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  11. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  12. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  13. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  14. 15-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  15. 08-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  16. 29-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  17. 17-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  18. 05-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  19. 24-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  20. 03-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  21. 15-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  22. 03-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  23. 22-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  24. 10-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  25. 03-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  26. 13-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  27. 01-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal District Judge

  28. 11-Jul-2025

    Order

    Principal District Judge

  29. 03-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  30. 13-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  31. 06-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  32. 30-May-2025

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  33. 07-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 07-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CMA No. 47/2025 The Principal District Judge of Junagadh allowed the applicant's delay condonation application. The applicant had filed two suits (271/2017 and 272/2017) seeking eviction of tenants, both dismissed. Due to a bona fide mistake, withdrawal was filed in one appeal while arguments were submitted in another. The applicant sought condonation for a 16-month delay in filing a review petition, citing ill health. The court granted the application based on the Supreme Court's B. Madhuri Goud precedent favoring substantial justice over technical grounds, and imposed costs of Rs. 15,000 payable to opponents within 7 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case