SANJAYBHAI BAVKUBHAI MAKVANA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 196/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010005422026
Filing Number
196/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
196/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
13-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203025260170
Police Station
JUNAGADH TALUKA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAYBHAI BAVKUBHAI MAKVANA
Adv. B R PANSURIA
NIKUNJBHAI DEVAYATBHAI VASIYA
Adv. B R PANSURIA
JAYDIP ALIAS BHOLO LAKHUBHAI MAKVANA
Adv. B R PANSURIA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT
Hearing History
Judge: 13-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of CRMA No. 196-26 The Gujarat High Court rejected the bail application of three accused (Sanjaybhai Bavkubhai Makvana, Nikunjbhai Devayatbhai Vasiya, and Jaydip alias Bholo Lakhubhai Makvana) charged under IPC sections 140(4), 309(4), 115(2), 296(b), 351(3), 54, and Gujarat Police Act section 135 for alleged kidnapping, robbery, and wrongful confinement. The court found the accusations serious, involving abduction, looting, physical assault with weapons, and death threats, and concluded that releasing the accused on bail would risk witness tampering, evidence obstruction, and flight from justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CRMA No. 196-26 The Gujarat High Court rejected the bail application of three accused (Sanjaybhai Bavkubhai Makvana, Nikunjbhai Devayatbhai Vasiya, and Jaydip alias Bholo Lakhubhai Makvana) charged under IPC sections 140(4), 309(4), 115(2), 296(b), 351(3), 54, and Gujarat Police Act section 135 for alleged kidnapping, robbery, and wrongful confinement. The court found the accusations serious, involving abduction, looting, physical assault with weapons, and death threats, and concluded that releasing the accused on bail would risk witness tampering, evidence obstruction, and flight from justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts