PRAMODBHAI TRIKAMBHAI BHAKHAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT NOTICE THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 195/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN010005382026

Filing Number

195/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

195/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

13-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203039260003

Police Station

MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAMODBHAI TRIKAMBHAI BHAKHAR

    Adv. K B JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT NOTICE THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMA No. 195/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Pramodbhai Trikambhai Bhakhar, accused of cyber fraud under IPC Sections 417(3) and 417(4), was REJECTED. The court found the allegations sufficiently serious and held that bail was not justified based on the gravity of offences, nature of accusations, and the prima facie case against the accused involving receipt of Rs. 18 lakh through fraudulent bank transfers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 195/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA No. 195/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Pramodbhai Trikambhai Bhakhar, accused of cyber fraud under IPC Sections 417(3) and 417(4), was REJECTED. The court found the allegations sufficiently serious and held that bail was not justified based on the gravity of offences, nature of accusations, and the prima facie case against the accused involving receipt of Rs. 18 lakh through fraudulent bank transfers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case