SHYAMBHAI MAHESHBHAI VASOYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT NOTICE THROUGH DISTRICT GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 194/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010005372026
Filing Number
194/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
194/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
3-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203039260002
Police Station
MENDARDA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHYAMBHAI MAHESHBHAI VASOYA
Adv. K B JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT NOTICE THROUGH DISTRICT GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: CRMA No. 194-26 Court Decision: The Gujarat High Court ordered the release of petitioner Shyambhai Maheshbhai Vasoya from judicial custody under the Indian Penal Code Section 482 (regular bail in land-related matter). The court found that the investigation into the case under IPC Section 482 was complete, there were no flight risks, and the accused had deep roots in the local community. The court determined that continued detention was unjustified given the investigation's conclusion and the nature of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Order
6th Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
6th Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 194/2026
Case Summary: CRMA No. 194-26 Court Decision: The Gujarat High Court ordered the release of petitioner Shyambhai Maheshbhai Vasoya from judicial custody under the Indian Penal Code Section 482 (regular bail in land-related matter). The court found that the investigation into the case under IPC Section 482 was complete, there were no flight risks, and the accused had deep roots in the local community. The court determined that continued detention was unjustified given the investigation's conclusion and the nature of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts