CHIRAG SHANTILAL SADHU (BAVAJI) vs STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 192/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010005272026
Filing Number
192/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
192/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
13-5th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203071250031
Police Station
CYBER POLICE STATION JUNAGADH RANGE-JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHIRAG SHANTILAL SADHU (BAVAJI)
Adv. D N APARNATHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court granted conditional interim bail to the accused in a temporary land seizure case under IPC Section 48. The accused must remain present during police custody periods, cooperate with investigations, and refrain from misusing freedom. Bail was granted on condition that the accused's wife remain present for a social event on March 28, 2026, with police escort arrangements at the accused's expense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
5th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
5th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 192/2026
Summary The court granted conditional interim bail to the accused in a temporary land seizure case under IPC Section 48. The accused must remain present during police custody periods, cooperate with investigations, and refrain from misusing freedom. Bail was granted on condition that the accused's wife remain present for a social event on March 28, 2026, with police escort arrangements at the accused's expense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts