KANA NATHABHAI BORKHATARIYA vs STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 191/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN010005262026

Filing Number

191/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

191/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

13-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203025260100

Police Station

JUNAGADH TALUKA POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANA NATHABHAI BORKHATARIYA

    Adv. J R JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    The court rejected the accused's bail petition in a serious criminal case involving theft of gold jewelry and cash. The court found that the accused faced strong prima facie charges of theft under Indian Penal Code sections 305(A), 331(3), and 331(4), with evidence suggesting involvement in grave offenses warranting imprisonment. While applying established bail principles balancing individual liberty against justice administration, the court determined that granting bail would pose risks of witness tampering, flight, and obstruction of proceedings, therefore denying the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    5th Addl District Judge

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 191/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the accused's bail petition in a serious criminal case involving theft of gold jewelry and cash. The court found that the accused faced strong prima facie charges of theft under Indian Penal Code sections 305(A), 331(3), and 331(4), with evidence suggesting involvement in grave offenses warranting imprisonment. While applying established bail principles balancing individual liberty against justice administration, the court determined that granting bail would pose risks of witness tampering, flight, and obstruction of proceedings, therefore denying the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case