ARBAZ ALIAS DHONI S/O IKBALBHAI HASAMBHAI KURESHI vs STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 190/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010005242026
Filing Number
190/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
190/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203023251218
Police Station
JUNAGADH A DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARBAZ ALIAS DHONI S/O IKBALBHAI HASAMBHAI KURESHI
Adv. J R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT Advocate - N K PUROHIT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 10-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA No.190-26 The court rejected the petitioner Arbaz Kureshi's bail application, denying his request for release on a regular bail bond in connection with cyber fraud and money laundering charges. The court found that Kureshi had orchestrated an elaborate cyber-enabled fraud scheme involving multiple bank accounts, fake transactions totaling ₹13,48,642, and commission skimming—activities demonstrating his deep involvement in organized financial crimes posing serious social harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA No.190-26 The court rejected the petitioner Arbaz Kureshi's bail application, denying his request for release on a regular bail bond in connection with cyber fraud and money laundering charges. The court found that Kureshi had orchestrated an elaborate cyber-enabled fraud scheme involving multiple bank accounts, fake transactions totaling ₹13,48,642, and commission skimming—activities demonstrating his deep involvement in organized financial crimes posing serious social harm. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts