ARJANBHAI ALIAS AJIT KARABHAI GAREJA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 188/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010005082026
Filing Number
188/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
188/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
13-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203071250031
Police Station
CYBER POLICE STATION JUNAGADH RANGE-JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARJANBHAI ALIAS AJIT KARABHAI GAREJA
Adv. R B PARMAR
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT
Hearing History
Judge: 13-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 10-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: CRMA No. 188-26 The court denied bail to accused Arjanbhai alias Ajit Karabhai Gareja in a cyber fraud case involving online cheating. The accused and associates allegedly opened multiple bank accounts, enabled internet banking, and received proceeds from cyber fraud totaling approximately Rs. 2.53 crores, of which Rs. 13.27 crores was deposited into their accounts to facilitate online cheating across Indian states. The court held that the gravity of the offense, the organized network involved in the cyber fraud scheme, financial gain derived therefrom, and the likelihood of witness tampering warranted denial of bail. The court applied established bail principles, emphasizing that serious offenses with organized criminal activity justify custody pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: CRMA No. 188-26 The court denied bail to accused Arjanbhai alias Ajit Karabhai Gareja in a cyber fraud case involving online cheating. The accused and associates allegedly opened multiple bank accounts, enabled internet banking, and received proceeds from cyber fraud totaling approximately Rs. 2.53 crores, of which Rs. 13.27 crores was deposited into their accounts to facilitate online cheating across Indian states. The court held that the gravity of the offense, the organized network involved in the cyber fraud scheme, financial gain derived therefrom, and the likelihood of witness tampering warranted denial of bail. The court applied established bail principles, emphasizing that serious offenses with organized criminal activity justify custody pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts