PIYUSH ALIAS JERI ALIAS CHARKHO S/O RAJESHBHAI KARSHANBHAI VADHER vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D C THAKER — 186/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN010005052026

Case disposed

Filing Number

186/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

186/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203023260176

Police Station

JUNAGADH A DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

PIYUSH ALIAS JERI ALIAS CHARKHO S/O RAJESHBHAI KARSHANBHAI VADHER

Adv. P B PANERI

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - D C THAKER

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

ORDER

11-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The court denied the bail application of the accused Piyush (alias Jeri, alias Charkho) under IPC Sections 118(2), 351(3), 506(b), 54, and IPC Section 135. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in stabbing the complainant's brother with a knife, causing serious injuries, and making death threats along with co-accused. The accused's active role in the crime, prior criminal history, risk of absconding, and potential to intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court denied the bail application of the accused Piyush (alias Jeri, alias Charkho) under IPC Sections 118(2), 351(3), 506(b), 54, and IPC Section 135. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in stabbing the complainant's brother with a knife, causing serious injuries, and making death threats along with co-accused. The accused's active role in the crime, prior criminal history, risk of absconding, and potential to intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case