PIYUSH ALIAS JERI ALIAS CHARKHO S/O RAJESHBHAI KARSHANBHAI VADHER vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - D C THAKER — 186/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010005052026
Filing Number
186/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
186/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203023260176
Police Station
JUNAGADH A DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PIYUSH ALIAS JERI ALIAS CHARKHO S/O RAJESHBHAI KARSHANBHAI VADHER
Adv. P B PANERI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - D C THAKER
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court denied the bail application of the accused Piyush (alias Jeri, alias Charkho) under IPC Sections 118(2), 351(3), 506(b), 54, and IPC Section 135. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in stabbing the complainant's brother with a knife, causing serious injuries, and making death threats along with co-accused. The accused's active role in the crime, prior criminal history, risk of absconding, and potential to intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court denied the bail application of the accused Piyush (alias Jeri, alias Charkho) under IPC Sections 118(2), 351(3), 506(b), 54, and IPC Section 135. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in stabbing the complainant's brother with a knife, causing serious injuries, and making death threats along with co-accused. The accused's active role in the crime, prior criminal history, risk of absconding, and potential to intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts