RAMSHIBHAI S/O RAMBHAI VIRAMBHAI BARAD vs STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - D C THAKER — 185/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN010005042026

Case disposed

Filing Number

185/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

185/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203004250565

Police Station

JUNAGADH C DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

RAMSHIBHAI S/O RAMBHAI VIRAMBHAI BARAD

Adv. J R JOSHI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - D C THAKER

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Court Decision The District and Sessions Court of Junagadh rejected the bail application of accused Ramshilabai/Visambhai Barde under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found that the accused was involved in serious charges including culpable homicide, criminal intimidation, and rioting, and that granting bail would pose a risk to public safety and the integrity of the investigation. The court emphasized that the gravity of the offense and criminal background of the accused warranted custody rather than release on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The District and Sessions Court of Junagadh rejected the bail application of accused Ramshilabai/Visambhai Barde under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found that the accused was involved in serious charges including culpable homicide, criminal intimidation, and rioting, and that granting bail would pose a risk to public safety and the integrity of the investigation. The court emphasized that the gravity of the offense and criminal background of the accused warranted custody rather than release on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case