RAMSHIBHAI S/O RAMBHAI VIRAMBHAI BARAD vs STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - D C THAKER — 185/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010005042026
Filing Number
185/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
185/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203004250565
Police Station
JUNAGADH C DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMSHIBHAI S/O RAMBHAI VIRAMBHAI BARAD
Adv. J R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - D C THAKER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Court Decision The District and Sessions Court of Junagadh rejected the bail application of accused Ramshilabai/Visambhai Barde under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found that the accused was involved in serious charges including culpable homicide, criminal intimidation, and rioting, and that granting bail would pose a risk to public safety and the integrity of the investigation. The court emphasized that the gravity of the offense and criminal background of the accused warranted custody rather than release on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 185/2026
Summary of Court Decision The District and Sessions Court of Junagadh rejected the bail application of accused Ramshilabai/Visambhai Barde under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found that the accused was involved in serious charges including culpable homicide, criminal intimidation, and rioting, and that granting bail would pose a risk to public safety and the integrity of the investigation. The court emphasized that the gravity of the offense and criminal background of the accused warranted custody rather than release on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts