FARUK HASAN KHADIM vs STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 183/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010004952026
Filing Number
183/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
183/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203038260010
Police Station
MANGROL POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
FARUK HASAN KHADIM
Adv. D N APARNATHI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT SUMMONS THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - N K PUROHIT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA No. 183-26 The court granted bail to petitioner Faruk Hasan Khadim in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 8(i), 22(ii), and 29 related to illegal mephedrone drug possession and sale. The court found sufficient grounds for bail, considering the investigation's completion, the petitioner's local roots, lack of criminal history, and applicable legal precedents, while imposing strict conditions including police station reporting, residence disclosure, and a bond of Rs. 25,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA No. 183-26 The court granted bail to petitioner Faruk Hasan Khadim in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 8(i), 22(ii), and 29 related to illegal mephedrone drug possession and sale. The court found sufficient grounds for bail, considering the investigation's completion, the petitioner's local roots, lack of criminal history, and applicable legal precedents, while imposing strict conditions including police station reporting, residence disclosure, and a bond of Rs. 25,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts