CHANDANKUMAR AKSHAYANKUMAR MOHANTI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 180/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN010004912026

Filing Number

180/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

180/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

13-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203024250572

Police Station

JUNAGADH B DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDANKUMAR AKSHAYANKUMAR MOHANTI

    Adv. N J DHAMANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Gujarat High Court (CRMA No. 180-26, decided March 13, 2026) dismissed bail petitions in a sim card fraud case involving multiple accused. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused defrauded customers by fraudulently registering sim cards in others' names and selling them for personal gain, constituting serious offenses under IPC sections 318, 316, 419, 336, 340, 54, and IT Act sections 66(c) and 42(3). Despite prosecution evidence and the grave nature of the crimes, the court rejected bail, emphasizing that the severity of fraud, nature of evidence, and risk of witness tampering warranted custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 180/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court (CRMA No. 180-26, decided March 13, 2026) dismissed bail petitions in a sim card fraud case involving multiple accused. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused defrauded customers by fraudulently registering sim cards in others' names and selling them for personal gain, constituting serious offenses under IPC sections 318, 316, 419, 336, 340, 54, and IT Act sections 66(c) and 42(3). Despite prosecution evidence and the grave nature of the crimes, the court rejected bail, emphasizing that the severity of fraud, nature of evidence, and risk of witness tampering warranted custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case