MO.ARMAN MO.TAJULBHAI SHEKH vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - V G DONGA — 177/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010004882026
Filing Number
177/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
177/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203023250130
Police Station
JUNAGADH A DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MO.ARMAN MO.TAJULBHAI SHEKH
Adv. P D CHUDASMA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - V G DONGA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 177/2026 The Gujarat High Court approved the petitioner Mo. Arman Mo. Tajulbhai Shekh's petition seeking custody of a seized Android mobile phone (Vivo model, IMEI Nos. 866171077622498 and 866171077622480) that was confiscated during a criminal investigation under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(i), 64(2)(m), and POSCO Act Sections 6, 8, 12. The court granted conditional release of the device to the petitioner with strict conditions: the phone must not be transferred or sold, must be produced before the court when required, and cannot be used for any unlawful purposes during the ongoing case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 177/2026 The Gujarat High Court approved the petitioner Mo. Arman Mo. Tajulbhai Shekh's petition seeking custody of a seized Android mobile phone (Vivo model, IMEI Nos. 866171077622498 and 866171077622480) that was confiscated during a criminal investigation under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(i), 64(2)(m), and POSCO Act Sections 6, 8, 12. The court granted conditional release of the device to the petitioner with strict conditions: the phone must not be transferred or sold, must be produced before the court when required, and cannot be used for any unlawful purposes during the ongoing case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts