IMTIYAZ ALIAS BAPU S/O KARIMSHA ALIAS DILAVARBHAI HASAMSHA RAFAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 176/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN010004802026
Filing Number
176/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
176/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203023260132
Police Station
JUNAGADH A DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
IMTIYAZ ALIAS BAPU S/O KARIMSHA ALIAS DILAVARBHAI HASAMSHA RAFAI
Adv. D N APARNATHI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of CRMA No. 176-2026 The court rejected the petitioner Imtiyaz's plea for regular bail in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 75(2), 351(3), and POSCO Act Section 12. The petitioner was accused of sexually abusing a 16-year-old minor girl, luring her with marriage promises, and fleeing. The court found sufficient evidence of the crime, noted the ongoing investigation, and determined that granting bail could deter witnesses and allow the accused to influence evidence. The bail application was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CRMA No. 176-2026 The court rejected the petitioner Imtiyaz's plea for regular bail in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 87, 75(2), 351(3), and POSCO Act Section 12. The petitioner was accused of sexually abusing a 16-year-old minor girl, luring her with marriage promises, and fleeing. The court found sufficient evidence of the crime, noted the ongoing investigation, and determined that granting bail could deter witnesses and allow the accused to influence evidence. The bail application was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts