HARDIK ALIAS HARSHIL DIPAKBHAI ZAPDA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 175/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN010004792026

Filing Number

175/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

175/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT JUNAGADH

Judge

3-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203023240799

Police Station

JUNAGADH A DIVISION POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARDIK ALIAS HARSHIL DIPAKBHAI ZAPDA

    Adv. R D THAKER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMA No. 175-26 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the bail application and DISMISSED the petition. The accused, Hardik alias Harshil Dipakbhai Zapda, was ordered to remain in custody under charges including criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and sexual assault under the Indian Penal Code (2023) and relevant sections of the BNS. The court found the gravity of alleged offenses—involving serious sexual crimes against a victim—warranted detention, noting the accused's role was "highly significant and serious" and custody was necessary given the investigation's ongoing nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Respondents

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 175/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA No. 175-26 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the bail application and DISMISSED the petition. The accused, Hardik alias Harshil Dipakbhai Zapda, was ordered to remain in custody under charges including criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and sexual assault under the Indian Penal Code (2023) and relevant sections of the BNS. The court found the gravity of alleged offenses—involving serious sexual crimes against a victim—warranted detention, noting the accused's role was "highly significant and serious" and custody was necessary given the investigation's ongoing nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case